Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 06:03
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
5 symptoms of colon cancer that should not be ignored - Times of India
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What’s next?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Observations from Day 5 of OTAs - Cleveland Browns
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Why Cutting Carbs Usually Backfires—and What to Do Instead - EatingWell
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
BBC Stands By Newsreader Who Corrected Autocue From “Pregnant People” To “Women” - Deadline
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Why is it rare for someone to despise both the Democrats and Republicans?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Thank you.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Why do a bra and panties have to match?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?